Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that, with respect to the punishment (one year of imprisonment and 80 hours of completion of sexual assault treatment programs) of the judgment of the court below as to the summary of the grounds for appeal, the prosecutor too unfiened so that the prosecutor is too unfied and thus unfair.

2. In light of the following factors: (a) the method and frequency of each of the instant crimes; and (b) the victims suffering from mental pain, etc., the case is serious and not good; (c) the Defendant has been punished for violent crimes; and (d) the Defendant has recognized the facts charged and is in profoundly contradictory to the facts charged; and (c) the victims wish to punish the Defendant with an agreement with the victims, etc., are more favorable grounds for sentencing.

The judgment of the court below is reasonable, in light of the above factors, in full view of the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, and all other matters pertaining to the sentencing indicated in the records and arguments of this case, since the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.