logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.08.27 2015고정736
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a bus bus B.

On January 6, 2015, the Defendant driving the above vehicle around 22:40, and driving a five-lane in front of Sungnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Area C at a speed of about 40km each hour in the direction of Jungwon-gu in the mother space.

The right turn to the right at the crosssection of the Modern market.

There are four cross-sections where signal, etc. is installed and operated, and the vehicle traffic is frequent.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to take into account the traffic situation well and to prevent accidents in advance by driving a motor vehicle safely in accordance with good faith.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not properly confirm the right and left turn, and the part of the driver's seat of the vehicle in the E bus driven by the victim D (ma, 48 years old) who was driving at the right and left turn, conflict with the front part of the vehicle. The above damaged vehicle, which was pushed on the right side, led to a continuous collision with the entire part of the vehicle in GM5 taxi operated by the victim F (ma, 58 years old) who was driving on the right side.

As a result, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing his duties, sustained injury to the victims H(V, 20 years of age), on the part of the victim H(V) who was on board B bus vans for about two weeks in need of medical treatment, such as chlouds and tensions, and on the part of the victim D (V, 48 years of age) who is a driver of a van vehicle, about two weeks in need of medical treatment, and on the part of the victim F (V, South and 58 years of age) who is a driver of GM5 taxi cab driver, each victim was injured by each victim, as shown in the list of sights by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual survey report and the statement on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of vehicle photographs and on-site photographs statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under Relevant Acts concerning criminal facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Commercial concurrence;

arrow