A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

The defendant pays 45,00,000 won to the applicant for compensation. In this case, the defendant shall pay 45,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 12, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 20, 2016.

"2014 Highest 1691" Defendant was working on February 19, 2012 by the Defendant who was in Busan Highest Do Office No. 706 of Busan Highest Do Office Office Office.

At the E office, the victim C will receive a successful bid in the name of the victim if the bid bond related to the successful bid of the auction real estate is the first place.

On February 20, 2012, and on March 16, 2012, 200,000 won was remitted from the injured party to the Cit Bank account in F’s name, and on March 16, 2012, 45 million won was arbitrarily consumed and embezzled from July 2012 until July 2012 for personal purposes such as office operation expenses operated by the defendant.

"2016 Highest 827"

1. On October 2008, the Defendant, at the “H” restaurant located in Busan-gu Busan-gu Busan-gu Busan-do, has the ability to make the victim I and J to auction differently from other people.

At the time of cash payment, real estate will be awarded as a successful bidder.

‘False speech' was made.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to receive a successful tender, as a person of bad credit standing who received money from the victims and tried to pay his personal debts and use them as living expenses.

The defendant deceivings victims as above and transferred 15 million won from the victims to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in F on October 27, 2008.

2. On May 20, 2012, the Defendant, at the “H” restaurant located in Busan-gu Busan-gu Busan-gu Busan-do, provided the victims with the good thing “competing the settlement.”

The right of retention is loaned from the ground and the settlement became the same.

In order to pay money, it will receive and award a loan with the money.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to receive a successful tender, because he received money from the victims, paid personal debts and used them as office operating expenses.