logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.11.24 2017가단12937
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b)payment of 12,986,666 won;

C. Newly Inserted by Presidential Decree No. 2890, Jul. 2017

Reasons

In full view of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (including additional numbers), the facts constituting the grounds for the claim are recognized, and there is no counter-proof.

According to this, the lease agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant on the real estate listed in the separate sheet between the plaintiff and the defendant was terminated and terminated lawfully at the latest by the time when the plaintiff delivered the defendant's notice of termination on May 29, 2017, for the reason of the defendant's delinquency in rent for the eight-month period.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to deliver the above building to the plaintiff and return the unjust enrichment of the rent in arrears and the amount equivalent to the rent in arrears to the plaintiff. Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow