logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2014.04.11 2013고단927
재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Godan927] On November 16, 2013, the Defendant, at around 11:30 on November 16, 2013, around D Arboretums-gun C, without any justifiable reason, was drunk in the D Arboretums ecological training center, and the Defendant destroyed 20,000 won of the market price attached to the front door of the driver's seat and the front door of the Fteas, which is owned by the victim E, an arboretum visitors.

[2014 Highest 139] On December 9, 2013, the Defendant was instructed to verify the results of cadastral and civil petition treatment in the Taean-Gun civil petition office located in the Taean-Gun Office of Taean-gun, Taean-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Tae-gun, Chungcheongnam-do on the ground that he did not meet the person in charge, but was sent at the Taean-Gun Office around 21:50 on the same day, to provide civil petition service and consultation with the public official in charge and to visit the next day.

At around 22:45 on the same day, the Defendant was found in the watchkeeping room of the Taean-Gun Office while drunking, and was seated at the show, and there was a person on duty, who was in duty, and there was a noise that “I have been infinite by a person on duty, who was infinite, and who was infinite to the duty officer.”

The Defendant was faced with the worker on duty, and was requested by the police assigned for special guard belonging to the Taean-gun Office to leave from the worker on duty, but the Defendant continued to sound while G was faced with the Defendant’s shoulder and caused by a shock and shock, and assaulted the face of G in the worker on duty and the chest part of the chest in drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of public officials' order in the office building.

Summary of Evidence

[2013 Height927]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of E and H;

1. Photographs (part of destruction and damage);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer to G, I, J, and K;

1. Damage photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning investigation reports (Attachment of G employment certificates) and certificates of employment attached thereto;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Code for the crime at issue (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties), Article 366 of the Criminal Code (the point of destruction and damage of property), and Article 1.

arrow