1. The part against Defendant D in the judgment of the first instance is modified as follows:

Defendant D, 1 Plaintiff A, 7,685.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A is the owner of the Hongcheon-gun Elux 2,126 square meters, and Plaintiff B is the owner of the Flux 1,104 square meters and the 126 square meters wide and twenty-six square meters wide and twenty-six-six square meters wide and twenty-six-six square meters wide and twenty-six square meters wide and

Meanwhile, the Plaintiff was owned by Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun H 638 square meters, and the ownership transfer registration was completed on August 11, 2008.

B. Defendant C is an owner of the land of which KRW 620 square meters in Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, K forest of KRW 1,073 square meters, Hongcheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, and 1,120 square meters in the land of which

C. The status of land owned by the plaintiffs and the defendants is as shown in the attached Form 1 drawing.

Defendant C applied for a building permit to construct a building on the ground above the land owned by Defendant C, and obtained the permission from January 13, 201 to June 30, 201 for the exclusive use period from January 13, 201.

E. On April 25, 2011, Defendant C sold the above J, K, L, and M Forest to an advanced livestock farming comprehensive corporation. At the time, Defendant D represented by the advanced livestock farming comprehensive corporation, and Defendant D used construction machinery such as scrails, etc. in the vicinity of the Plaintiff’s land from July 10, 201 to July 20, 201.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul's statements and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. 원고들의 주장 피고 C는 2011. 7. 10.부터 같은 달 20.까지 사이에 피고 C 소유의 토지를 개발하기 위하여 피고 D에게 지시하여, 피고 D로 하여금 포크레인 등의 건설기계를 동원하여 평탄 및 성토작업을 하였는데, 그 과정에서 원고들 소유의 위 각 토지를 아래와 같이 훼손하였고, 그로 인하여 원고들에게 복구비용 상당의 손해를 입혔으므로, 원고 A에게 별지 제2도면 ⓒ, ⓓ, ⓔ 지점에 대한 복구비용 합계 21,558,894원, 원고 B에게 별지 제2도면 ⓑ, ⓕ, ⓖ 지점에 대한 복구비용 합계 12,773,164원, 원고들에게 별지...