1. The defendant shall pay the plaintiff KRW 130,000,000.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3.Paragraph 1.

1. The following facts are not disputed between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1-1, 2, 3, 2 and 3, and Eul evidence No. 4:

On April 12, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) with the Defendant on the sales price of KRW 180 million (hereinafter “each of the instant land”). On April 12, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement with the Defendant on the sales price of KRW 228 square meters (hereinafter “1”), KRW 126 square meters prior to C during permanent residence (hereinafter “2”) and KRW 126 square meters prior to D (hereinafter “2 land”); ③ the remainder on April 20, 2015; and KRW 130 million prior to E, KRW 30 million,000,000,000 for each of the instant land. The Plaintiff agreed to receive the payment of KRW 180,000,000 for the down payment and KRW 10,000,000 for the remainder on April 20, 2015.

B. The Defendant paid the Plaintiff the down payment of KRW 10 million on April 12, 2015, and KRW 40 million on April 13, 2015, respectively.

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of claim, barring any other special circumstances, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the remainder KRW 130 million according to the sales contract of this case.

B. The summary of the Defendant’s argument 1 as to the Defendant’s assertion is that at the time of the instant sales contract, the Plaintiff was 100,000 won at the time of the instant sales contract, and 2. As each of the instant lands is attached, each of the instant lands may be combined into one parcel and constructed one building on the ground.

However, the market price of each of the instant lands is excessive to KRW 50,00,000, and all of the instant lands are far away, and the land between the first and second lands is so blind that no access can be made without passing through the said other person’s land due to the land of the other person, and each area of the instant land was small so that no use is possible.

If the defendant knew the above facts, the defendant did not purchase each of the lands of this case, or 10,000 won per square day.