The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (five million won a penalty) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant reflects the judgment, most of the damages were recovered, that the victim of the exercise of the right does not want the punishment of the Defendant, that the victim of the exercise of the right does not want the punishment of the Defendant, and that the equity with the judgment should be considered at the same time with the case of the judgment. However, these points appears to have been fully taken into account in the lower court. However, even if the Defendant had been punished for the crime of property, it appears that the Defendant repeated the crime despite the fact that the damage was not small, and that the damage was not small, and that all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, family relationship

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.