Defendants shall be sentenced to three months of imprisonment, and the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for two years from the date when this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From around 01:00 on May 21, 2016 to 01:30 on the same day, the Defendants left the victim D(333) main points of this “E” operated by the victim D(E) located in Gwangju Seo-gu, Gwangju-gu, with the influence of alcohol, and left the victim’s “no drinking value,” for the reason that the victim and employees, who are the main business owners, are prevented from drinking by drinking their horses to female customers, and left the victim’s “no drinking value, receiving the drinking value to the female,” and prevented them from entering the toilet at the victim’s main point of drinking.

After all, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the victim's main business by force between about 30 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol concerning the suspect examination of the police officers against the Defendants

1. Statement protocol with respect to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written agreement;

1. Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the scope of recommendation) is [the grounds for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the scope of recommendation] [the grounds for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the scope of business interference] [one month to eight months] mitigation area (including any effort made by a special mitigated person] [the decision of sentence] mitigation area (including any effort made to recover from damage], and the defendants recognized the crime of this case, and agreed with the owner of the damage business and the owner of the damage.

However, there are many records of juvenile protective disposition or suspension of indictment against the Defendants in relation to violence.

In addition, it is decided as per Disposition by comprehensively taking into account all the circumstances regarding sentencing, such as the developments leading to the instant case or the degree of damage.