1. The plaintiff's appeal and the defendant's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2. Costs arising from an appeal and an incidental appeal shall be respectively.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff and defendant of the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justified even if the evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is based on the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, 19 of the second 2nd 19 of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as "the shock level of the plaintiff's vehicle and the shock level of the defendant's vehicle." The plaintiff's new argument as the grounds for appeal are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for further determination as to the plaintiff's new argument as the grounds for appeal No. 2. 2. As such, it is citing

2. Judgment on the Plaintiff’s additional assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion spent KRW 723,445 at the cost required for physical appraisal in the instant case, and planned to spend KRW 3,00,000 for future medical expenses. Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay damages to the Plaintiff plus the above expenses.

B. First of all, the costs of physical examination can be reimbursed after the final judgment became final and conclusive, since the costs of physical examination as the costs of lawsuit can be reimbursed after the final and conclusive judgment becomes final and conclusive, this cannot be claimed as a separate active damages.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

Next, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the claim for future medical expenses needs to be paid KRW 3 million in the future medical expenses. Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal and the defendant's incidental appeal are dismissed as they are without merit.