Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

On June 8, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 22:10, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, a lotet, which was located in Seosan-dong, with a private taxi in front of the department store, and (b) as a private taxi in B (the age of 47). On the ground that B resisted this, the Defendant saw B’s b, spherb, and sphered B.

In addition, when the victim C(50 years of age) meets the defendant, he saw the victim's breath, spathing the victim's breath in the floor, spathing the victim's face from the floor, spathing the victim's face, spathing the victim's side, cutting off the d(41 years of age) and spathing the d(41 years of age).

As a result, the Defendant got around 14 days of treatment to the victim, such as dump dump sump in need of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to B, D, and C;

1. Photographs of each victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the facts charged was assaulted by each victim B and D, as indicated in the judgment.

2. The conclusion of the judgment is the case that falls under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the records, the victims expressed their intention not to punish the defendant on November 15, 2012.

Therefore, this part of the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.