logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.26 2017노2942
명예훼손
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of grounds for appeal;

A. From 2 to 3 years from the instant case, there was a question that “H’s wife G and I have winded,” and H had a question from the Defendant.

Although the Defendant had talked with F, the Defendant had expressed a question that “I and I had been imprisoned with the denial of good faith” against H on the day of this case.

at any time in this case, and at any time in this case

It was only required to confirm “,” and there was no such fact as stated in the facts charged that “I and Neas are winded to be treated as a tree by Neas, but there was no feas and Neas are known to all members of Neasas.”

B. The performance of the Defendant’s talk is not recognized in the crime of defamation because it is not likely to spread to many and unspecified persons.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the court below fully recognized the fact that the defendant talked with H that "I and Neas are treated as trees, but I and Neas are not aware of such reduction," and since there were many people, such as E and F, etc. at the time, the performance of the crime of defamation is recognized.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow