logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.25 2017노3506
상해등
Text

All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant (as to the interference with the performance of official duties), the Defendant did not have the chest of the police officer G in performing official duties by hand.

2. The sentence of the lower court (two years of suspended execution in August, and one hundred and twenty hours of community service order) which was unfair to be too unreasonable.

B. The prosecutor (unfair sentencing)’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the judgment of the court below as to the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts and evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below, i.e., the police officer G consistently stated the main part of the facts charged that the Defendant entered a store and pushed down his body in relation to the reported matters of 112 on the Defendant’s daily work from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, and the Defendant was consistently stated as to the facts charged that he was engaged in search against the Defendant’s daily work. ② A police officer who was dispatched to the scene along with G was dispatched to the scene, and the Defendant was a police officer who was pushed down the shoulder and the shoulder part of G on the right side of the G under investigation against the owner of the D primary work.

The statement is consistent with the above G's statement, <3> the statement of the witness O of the party, the screen image and the caps taken on the scene of the crime of this case (Evidence No. 13, 15, etc.) are located at a place far away from the entrance and exit of the store. As such, G appears to have been located at a place far away from the entrance and exit of the store, there is no possibility that the defendant might be mistaken for the defendant to enter the store, and ④ The victim Ha who was assaulted by the defendant Ha's daily behavior stated in the written statement prepared by the police that "the victim (the victim "the victim" refers to the victim "the victim " Eul" hereinafter) at the time of his/her birth is a clerical error and arrested by obstructing the performance of official duties." In the police investigation process, "the defendant satising the police satch with the police."

arrow