1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On November 6, 1985, while working for the Daewoo Shipbuilding Marine Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the workplace of this case”), the Plaintiff was affected by occupational accidents (hereinafter “occupational accidents in 1998”), which caused the head’s injury to pine trees that were in excess of pine trees working at the instant workplace on March 29, 198. From the Defendant, the Plaintiff was subject to medical treatment with the approval of the medical treatment for the “surgical signboard escape certificate between 5-6 and 5-6 in the 1998.” After the completion of the medical treatment, the Plaintiff was subject to the judgment of Grade 9 subparag. 15 in the disability grade. On April 17, 2002, the Plaintiff demanded the promotion of the salary class at the instant workplace of this case, and was led to his injury or injury during the course of his occupational injury (hereinafter “the medical treatment for the Defendant’s injury”). The Plaintiff was presumed to have been 20 years after the completion of the medical treatment for the Defendant’s injury (hereinafter “the Defendant’s injury”).

On October 28, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care (hereinafter “instant application”) with the Defendant with respect to the “major depression and net disability (e.g., compilation)” (hereinafter “instant injury”). However, on November 18, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval thereof (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Grounds for recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 7, 11, 15, 26, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 1 through 3, and the purport of the entire argument as to the validity of the disposition of this case as to the validity of the disposition of this case, the plaintiff alleged that the plaintiff was the first application for medical care for occupational accidents in 2002 upon the application of this case. However, the defendant was dismissed by the application for medical care for occupational accidents in 1998, and the defendant

Due to occupational accidents in 2002, the escape certificate of a conical signboard No. 4-5 was generated to the Plaintiff, and the injury of this case was caused by the nephical disease caused by the escape certificate of the said conical signboard.