(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.07.29 2015고단1425

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.07.29 2015고단1425

상해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 24, 2015, around 23:13, 2015, at the front of the D cafeteria located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant driving away from the victim E (n'e, 60 years old) who walked along the paths, led the Defendant to go beyond the future by pushing the victim with his own sound, and by his hand.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as the cutting of flasium, which requires approximately four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partial police officers of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A victim's photograph;

1. A report on dispatch to the scene;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 257 (1) of the relevant criminal law for the crime of this case [the scope of recommending punishment] general injury [the person under special guard] and special aggravation (6 to 3 years) [the person under special guard], the victim (the victim under sentence] who is vulnerable to the crime of this case even though the defendant was sentenced to a fine although there are many kinds of criminal records, the defendant again committed the crime of this case even though he was sentenced to a fine, and the defendant was under the influence of drinking even though there was no motive for the crime against the unspecified victim returning home at the late time without any motive for the crime of this case, while he was under the influence of drinking a considerable distance from the victim, he was under the influence of driving away from the victim, and it cannot be seen that he did not mislead the defendant, so it cannot be seen that the victim was under the influence of protecting him more than the age of the socially weak since he was under the influence of the victim at that time, and it cannot be seen to have been under the Medical Treatment Act, as well as the circumstances leading up to the type of the crime of this case.

참조조문

-형법 제257조 제1항

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.09.07 2016고단2769

-대법원 2008. 10. 9. 선고 2008후1470 판결

-대법원 2018. 7. 11. 선고 2014두40227 판결

-대법원 2002. 3. 29. 선고 2000두8455 판결

-대전지방법원 2012.7.16.선고 2012고합57 판결