1. As to KRW 86,761,643 and KRW 70,00,00 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff the year from June 28, 2018 to July 26, 2019.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 17, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with the Defendant (former trade name “C”) to invest a certain amount in the business that purchased collateral bonds (hereinafter “instant agreement”). The main contents are as follows.

Article 1. Objecting to Investment (Mortgage Mortgage): The mortgagee of Gyeonggi-do E and 13 lots (hereinafter “instant real estate”): the maximum debt amount: F corporation 2,206,50,000 won: the actual amount of investment amount of KRW 2,200: the estimated investment amount of KRW 70,000: The estimated investment period of KRW 70,000 from the date of the contract to the date of distributing the auction case of KRW 6-7 months.

(c)investment proceeds and time of payment: 20 percent (20%) interest per annum on actual investments shall be paid in the subsequent payment system when dividends are paid;

The cost of establishing a pledge: The "investors" shall bear the expenses (including taxes) incurred by the creation of a pledge when the "investors" intends to establish a pledge.

Article 3 Obligations

1. Company’s duty 2) shall be paid in good faith to the agreed return on investment. B. The Plaintiff wired KRW 70 million to G account, the Defendant’s representative on the date of the instant agreement. (c) On the date of the instant agreement, the Defendant entered into a mutual agreement for the acquisition of claims with HA assets management company and was transferred the collateral security in the name of the said company, which was established on the instant real estate. D. In the auction procedure for the instant real estate (U.S. branch support I, etc.) on March 27, 2018, the Defendant was awarded the instant real estate under the name of Defendant G’s representative, and the said auction distribution procedure (hereinafter “instant dividend”).

(A) June 27, 2018 was concluded. [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, each entry in the evidence A1 or 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]

2. Judgment on the ground of the Plaintiff’s claim

A. The defendant is regardless of whether there was profit in the subject matter of the contract of this case by the plaintiff 1's summary of the parties' assertion.