A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On October 13, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor due to an injury, etc. by the Seoul Northern District Court, and on June 27, 2018, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence in the Seoul Eastern House.

[Criminal facts]

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On July 7, 2018, the Defendant reported the conversation between the students visiting a restaurant operated by the victim C in Seoul Jung-gu, Seoul, on July 18, 2018, and without any particular reason, “boomed with boomed boom.”

It is not good to say that today's internal system is not good.

With regard to the crym, "the crym," etc. and the crym of the victim's age, why is the hymar test.

In doing so, she shall be deemed as shealy, and she shall throw away shealy, she shall die and die.

Along to about 30 minutes of the disturbance, “hump,” dumping the table table and the chair on the floor, she could not enter the said restaurant by avoiding disturbance for about 30 minutes.

B. On August 2, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 08:15, around the convenience store operated by the victim E in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul; (b) changed three closing cups to the victim; and (c) the victim “I need to calculate the closing cups.”

B. There is no money for the reason that he said that he made the word “......”

Around 15 minutes of a disturbance, such as “Satch D, Chewing, and the same year, and how much business interference will present, and how much he will be seen as funeral,” was expressed to the public in a large sense, which makes it impossible for customers to enter the convenience store.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business and convenience store business by force.

2. On July 8, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 00:00, the victim G in the Seoul Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul, was provided with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 45,000 from the victim, as if he/she had no intent or ability to pay the drinking value, etc., in the main place where he/she works as an employee.

In this respect, the defendant deceivings the victim to take property.