beta본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2018.03.22 2018가단49
제3자이의
Text
1. The Defendant’s executory exemplification of the judgment of Jeonju District Court 2016Kahap51 against Nonparty C.
Reasons
1. On December 27, 2017, the Defendant indicated the claim, based on the executory exemplification of the judgment of Jeonju District Court 2016Kahap51 rendered compulsory execution against Nonparty C on the goods indicated in the separate sheet at the domicile of C on December 27, 2017.
(No. 2017No. 539). However, the above article is owned by the Plaintiff, which purchased and kept in C.
Therefore, compulsory execution against the above goods should not be permitted.
2. Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts.