logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.08.25 2017고정1593
공갈등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant raised a mind to attract money and valuables to taxi drivers who proceed without stopping in the crosswalk of “heat distance” located in the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, in which people are passing through the new wall time zone, by pretending them to the victim of the traffic accident.

A. On August 20, 2016, around 20:00, the Defendant discovered that a private taxi operated by a victim ET (63 tax, south) does not stop in new name and intentionally fell off on the top of the steering line of the relevant private taxi and was used on the floor in around 134 with the well in the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.

In addition, while moving to a hospital, the victim was frightened to the victim, "I can listen to a fluence of the people around the day of the night and change his mind, so I would like to solve this problem today, and I would like to give money under the pretext of a mutual agreement," and the victim was frightened with a certificate of insurance.

As such, the Defendant got 250,000 won in cash at the same place from the victim who frightened the victim and was delivered to him.

B. On September 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) discovered that an individual taxi (EV, rocketing) operating in the EU does not stop in the name of a new passenger taxi and intentionally faced with his body on the back of the top of the operation of the individual taxi in question, on the top of the operation of the passenger taxi in question, around 02:00 of the Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, and on the top of the operation of the passenger taxi.

Therefore, although it was intended to demand money from the victim of frightage, it was intended to demand money to the victim, but the personal taxi drivers who suffered damage by the same method were not aware of the crime and attempted to commit the crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement concerning the EU and ET;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a copy of cash loan certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 350(1) of the Criminal Act (a) of the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 352 and 350(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38 Section 1 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.

arrow