logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.11.07 2011노389
근로기준법위반등
Text

Part 1, 2, 3-A, 5, 6, 7 of the judgment of the first and second original courts shall be reversed, respectively.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

(a) The sentence sentenced by the second instance court (one year, imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes of Category 1, 2, 3-Ga, 5, 6, and 7 in the form of imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes of Category 1, 2, 3-Ga, 5, 6, and 7 in the form of judgment, and for the crimes of Category 3-Da, Ra, f, f, g, and

B. Defendant 1) As to Article 7(a) of the judgment of the court of first instance, the sentence of eight months sentenced by the court of first instance is too unreasonable and unfair. (2) As to Article 7(1) of the judgment of the court of second instance, the Defendant was introduced with the introduction of the victim AD, his father, and received 310 million won from the victim by the introduction of the victim AC, the father of his father, and then did not use the above money to purchase the land and perform civil works related to the business of care facilities for the disabled, which he promoted by the victim AY, as well as to repair expenses for new apartment owned by the above AY, and not to arbitrarily use the above money to the victim with the intention of defraudation. (2) As to Article 7(b) of the judgment of the court of second instance, the Defendant did not agree that the victim and the 300 million won were the victim’s father at the time of borrowing the above money under the name of 30 billion won for the purpose of insurance of the victim.

arrow