A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 7, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of one million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court, and on July 20, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of eight million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving motor vehicles B.

1. On January 26, 2018, the Defendant: (a) driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol for about 0.163% of alcohol concentration from the 1km section from the roads in front of a mutual influence restaurant located in the Seogu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu to the front road of the D Institute located in the same Gu C, to the previous road of the D Institute located in the same Gu.

As a result, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, who violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice.

2. On January 26, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driving a motor vehicle with 0.163% alcohol concentration in blood while under the influence of alcohol around 23:40 on January 26, 2018, and continued the front road of the D Driving Institute C in Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, into the border protection of the Defendant’s products at the village.

At all times, there was a vehicle standing in front of the defendant's moving direction as a second road, so there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle in front of the defendant's moving direction so that the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by operating the steering wheel and brake system accurately so that it does not conflict with the preceding vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not properly see the steering room and did not operate the steering system properly and did not operate the steering system properly, and received the part of the front part of the victim E(63)-(63) vehicle following the Fpoter vehicle in the signal atmosphere, which was behind the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the above occupational negligence inflicted an injury upon the victim, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.