1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 10, 201, the Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant company, which is the manufacturing company, and worked as a production worker. On January 25, 201, the Plaintiff was subject to an accident that 2 and 3 chapters left left by eroding eroding eroding eroding erode and cut off by eroding eroding eroding eroding eroding eroding erode, while engaging in eroding eroding ero

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The plaintiff shall terminate medical care on July 25, 2013, and the same year.

8.7.Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service received 7,037,280 won of temporary layoff benefits (class 11), medical care benefits 7,345,570 won, and 26,573,790 won in total of disability benefits 12,190,940 won, and for the same year;

8. 13. The defendant prepared a separate agreement with the defendant, received KRW 2 million from the defendant, and left Vietnam, which is a senior country.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 4, Eul evidence 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. We examine whether the lawsuit of this case is legitimate, and the plaintiff prepared a written agreement with the defendant to the effect that "the plaintiff will agree on two million won in the agreed amount and will not impose any civil or criminal responsibility for it." The above written agreement contains both Korean and English, and the plaintiff's writing and English are combined, and the time when the written agreement was prepared is the time when all medical treatment is completed and the insurance benefits are paid after being assessed by the appraisal belonging to the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service. The plaintiff is deemed to have prepared a written agreement with the mind that the plaintiff would promptly terminate the dispute and return to the country, and there is no unexpected disability or damage not anticipated at the time of the preparation of the written agreement, and it is reasonable to deem that the plaintiff agreed not to impose any liability for the accident of this case against the defendant by receiving the agreed amount on August 13, 2013. Thus, the lawsuit of this case is dismissed as it is unlawful and dismissed as it is contrary to the attached agreement.