beta
Text
Defendant
E Imprisonment with labor for two years, for one year and six months, for Defendant G, for one year and one year and one year, for Defendant F and Defendant I.
Reasons
Criminal facts
Defendant
E, Defendant G, and Defendant I are a simple penalty, and Defendant F and Defendant G are friendlys.
In the event of an external traffic accident, in the insurance company, if the owner of a vehicle uses sirens until the time of repair of the vehicle, the long-term repair period is required due to the time required for the procurement of the parts, and as a result, the amount of compensation increases. Therefore, in order to reduce the amount of compensation, it is intended to obtain insurance money by abusing such compensation procedures with knowledge that there is a practice to pay the repair cost of the vehicle owner in an amount that falls short of the official repair cost (hereinafter “unscheduled repair cost”).
Accordingly, the Defendants intentionally caused the second accident after the first accident in order to unflut the repair dog due to the accident, or caused the second accident to cause an intentional accident, or attempted to receive the insurance money after causing the accident by either recruiting a driver of a sea vehicle, inducing an intentional accident independently, changing the passengers after the accident, or inserting the passengers after the accident.
1. Defendant E, Defendant G, Defendant I, and Defendant F were driving a bit-free car after the said 17:20 on December 23, 2011, on the road in the vicinity of the Geumsan Island at the time of Kim Jongbuk-gu, the road. Defendant I was driving Defendant E, Defendant G, and Defendant F on his own, in Tone Starp car, and L was driving a bit-free car after the said 17:20 on December 23, 201.
While the Defendants were in the above sobridged, Defendant I was in collusion with Defendant E, Defendant G, and Defendant F, and attempted to overtake the above Costapt with the opposite vehicle by intentionally operating the said Costapt in collusion with Defendant E, Defendant G, and Defendant F, and was trying to overtake the said Costapt by using the opposite vehicle, and again, the Defendants did not overtake the said Costapt, and instead did not have the L, who returned to the vehicle operated by the said Costapt, return to the said vehicle.