The defendant shall be innocent.

1. In the facts charged, the Defendant is a representative of E, an incorporated foundation located in Heung-gu D, Young-gu, and a building manager.

Persons related to specific fire-fighting objects shall implement the measures ordered by the director general of a fire-fighting headquarters or the head of a fire station for specific fire-fighting objects not installed, maintained, or managed in accordance with the fire safety standards.

On October 13, 2016, the Defendant was served with a corrective order issued by the Director of the Yongsan-gu Fire Station to the effect that “To extend the hedge to fire extinguishing equipment up to December 13, 2016, to install a stringr on the alarm equipment, etc., and to perform a total of 75 maintenance or replacement with respect to defective fire-fighting systems.” However, the Defendant did not implement four cases without justifiable grounds.

2. Determination

A. The burden of proof for the facts charged in a criminal trial is to be borne by a public prosecutor, and the conviction of guilt is based on evidence with probative value sufficient to ensure the judge that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is doubt of guilt against the defendant, it is inevitable to determine the defendant as the interest of the defendant (see Supreme Court Decision 2001Do2823, Aug. 21, 2001, etc.). (B) In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the defendant was ordered to correct the 75 defective fire-fighting systems, such as the facts charged by the head of the Yongsan-gu Fire Station around October 13, 2016, the defendant ordered the 75 defective fire-fighting systems to supplement the installation of the fire-fighting systems, and around November 2016, F subcontracted the installation of the fire-fighting systems to KNE for less than 10 days, but it was recognized that KNEM was ordered to supplement the installation of the light.

The above.