The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below rendered on the defendant (five million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the judgment is favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant acknowledges his mistake as a primary offender and reflects it, the transfer of the means of electronic financial transactions, such as the crime in this case, is highly likely to cause secondary damage, such as fraud. Considering the fact that the means of access actually transferred by the defendant was used in the crime of fraud, and the age, character and conduct, environment, criminal background, motive, means and result of the crime, all of the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments in this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, it is not deemed that the sentence imposed by the court below is

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.