logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.09.25 2019고단5252
공전자기록등위작등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 5, 2011, the Defendant was appointed as a public official belonging to the Korea Customs Service, and was a public official in charge of examining the cargo list imported from the Incheon Port while working in B agencies C from February 16, 2015 to March 2018, and inspecting the cargo subject to management after being dispatched to B agencies D teams from April 1, 2018.

On April 28, 2018, at around 09:30, the Defendant accepted the request from the customs broker I, who was contacted by the representative H of the (State) G, the freight containers (J) imported by the G corporation from the B institution C, which was subject to inspection, at the address of the Defendant in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and the Defendant’s dwelling.

At around 11:50 on the same day, the Defendant confirmed cargo information from B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B located in K at the second floor of the following B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B located in the same day, and moved to B B B B B B B B B B B office at the time when the employee on Saturdays worked for the occupation of the occupation for the occupation of the occupation of the occupation of the occupation of the occupation of the occupation of the occupation of the occupation of the occupation of the occupation of the occupation of the occupation of the occupation of the above L, using the gap without any way in the office, nine cargo loaded by G corporation on the screen of the electronic customs clearance system connected with the transportation of the said L corporation to its own ID, the above LL was removed and the reason for cancellation was removed by the entry of the goods loaded in the above container into the delivery date of the goods into the supply date of the goods, and reflected it in the electronic customs clearance system before it returned to the office or the office.

Accordingly, the Defendant, even though he did not have legitimate authority for the purpose of preventing the analysis of cargo information and the handling of cargo inspection by B, access to the L's electronic customs clearance system, which is an official electronic record, to which he had no legitimate authority.

arrow