1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, from May 201, provided labor under employment to the Defendant.

B. On March 2, 2014, the Plaintiff, at around 16:20 on March 2, 2014, was involved in the accident of cutting down the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the lower

(hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case"). [The grounds for recognition include the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and 6 (if there is a serial number, a serial number)

(2) each entry, video, and the purport of the entire pleading

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Defendant, as an employer, bears the duty to take necessary measures, such as improving physical environment so that the Plaintiff, who is an employee, does not harm life, body, and health in the course of providing labor, in accordance with the principle of good faith accompanied by the labor contract. The Defendant neglected safety education on the machinery and the working environment, inspection in advance, and supervision during the work, thereby causing the instant accident. Therefore, the Plaintiff shall compensate for the damages caused by the instant accident.

B. Although the Plaintiff appears to have caused the instant accident in the course of providing labor to the Defendant, there is no evidence to deem that the instant accident was caused by neglecting the Defendant’s safety education, preliminary inspection, and surveillance during the work.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is without merit to examine the scope of damages.

3. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.