All appeals by the prosecutor and the defendant are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1) misunderstanding of facts in the lower judgment: (a) each of the former deposits against the victims other than the victim N of the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, as indicated in the lower judgment (2014Da2489, 2014Kadan9084, 2015 Highest 4042, 2015 Godan4042, 2015 Highest 7089, 2016 Highest 631), the Defendant clearly stated that the Defendant is not the owner of the real estate for the victims at the time of concluding a charter agreement with the victims; (b) there was no false statement that the Defendant was an owner or a joint investor, and there was no intention to commit fraud.

B) As to the injury of the victim D on October 28, 2010 (2014da2489) of each injury to the victim D, there was no assault by the defendant, such as taking the victim's arms and taking the victim's arms, cutting the neck, etc. in the vehicle where D is running. As to the injury on May 24, 201, the defendant did not have any fact that the defendant used the victim's arms to prevent the Defendant from committing the assaulting the victim's arms to prevent the Defendant from committing the assaulting, and there was no fact that the Defendant used the victim's arms, such as taking the victim's arms, etc., to prevent the Defendant from committing the assaulting the victim's neck. C) At the time of committing each crime against X, each of the fraud, attack, and intimidation (2015No4042) with the victim X, each of the Defendant living together with the Defendant at the time of the lower judgment's judgment, each of the Defendant did not have led the Defendant to voluntarily commit any money, and there was no deception by the Defendant.

2) The sentence imposed by the lower court of unreasonable sentencing (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable and unfair. B. The prosecutor (the sentence imposed by the lower court of both types of unfair punishment) is too uneasible and unfair.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant also asserted the same purport in the lower court’s judgment as to the allegation of mistake of facts. In light of the circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated, the lower court.