All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Facts that there is no dispute over the details of the disposition (based on recognition), Gap 1, 2-1, 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings;

A. The Plaintiff’s position Hanyang Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”) is not a small and medium entrepreneur who has registered the engineering work business under Article 2 subparag. 2 of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry, and part of construction work pursuant to the said business is entrusted to a small and medium entrepreneur, such as the new industry. It constitutes a principal contractor under Article 2(2) of the former Fair Transactions in Subcontracting Act (amended by Act No. 11842, May 28, 2013; hereinafter “subcontract”).

The 40 companies listed in the annexed Form 2 business entity column, such as the new industry, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the “contractors of this case”) are small and medium business operators operating steel bars, concrete construction business, etc., who are entrusted with construction or manufacture related to various construction works by the Plaintiff, who is a business entity, and are subcontractors under Article 2(3) of the Subcontract Act.

나. 전문건설공사 시장 (1) 전문건설공사 수주시장 경쟁실태 ㈎ 건설업은 주문생산방식 위주로 생산활동이 이루어지고 표준원가에 의한 대량생산이 불가능하여 재고품이 허용되지 아니하므로 다른 업종에 비하여 탄력적인 경영에 어려움이 있다.

Therefore, in order for constructors to continue to run a construction business, it is very important task to secure sufficient quantity of contracts, and it is difficult to secure stable quantity of contracts due to high competition due to the aggravation of construction competition and the absence of a construction company.

㈏ 특히, 전문건설시장은 건설업체의 치열한 경쟁으로 인해 하도급공사의 저가 투찰행위가 지속적으로 이루어지고 있고, 전문건설업체는 이러한 치열한 경쟁 속에서 이윤추구보다는 최소한의 고정운영비 확보를 위한 수주활동에 주력하고 있으며, 주로 연고지역을 중심으로 원사업자에게...