Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 18:30 on September 20, 2013, the Defendant, a person driving a Gststststa car, followed the three-lanes in front of the cultural bookstore 1 in Seojin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Jinjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, along the two-lanes from the distance of the stadium to the Jinjin-gu square.

A person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering and steering devices.

Nevertheless, due to negligence, the part of the part concerning the rear part of the I Lart car driven by the victim H(35 years old) which was driven by the vehicle in the same direction two-lanes in the same direction as it is, instead of neglecting this, was inferred into the front part of the vehicle.

The Defendant damaged property equivalent to KRW 1,514,610 on the part of the injured vehicle, such as a parasper, etc. by occupational negligence, and got injured to the injured party for the injury of the damaged vehicle in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and left the scene without immediately getting the injured party and taking necessary measures, such as rescue of the casualties, even though the Defendant suffered from the injury of the fluoral base, the fluor of the damaged vehicle, the J (35 years of age), the Dong passenger of the same vehicle (13 years of age), and the same passenger of the same vehicle (10 years of age) for about two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Reports and photographs of traffic accidents;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. Application of the statutes applicable to each written diagnosis and written estimate for maintenance and checkup of motor vehicles;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The gist of the assertion is that the Defendant does not leave the scene with the intention of escape.