1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The grounds for the plaintiff's claim are as shown in the attached Form.

It is referred to in paragraph (2) or (3) of the attached Table.

In light of the Plaintiff’s assertion as stated in the [Attachment 2], it is not sufficient to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s assertion only with the descriptions of the evidence Nos. 1 through 10 (including the serial number), and there is no other evidence by the Plaintiff, even if the Defendant is the most lessee or the genuine lessee.

Rather, according to the evidence Nos. 6, 7, and 9-1, 2, 13, 17-1, 2, and 18 of the evidence Nos. 17-1, 2, and 18 of the evidence Nos. 6, 7, and 9-1, 2, and 18 of the Act, the Defendant can recognize the fact that the Defendant

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim for this part is without merit.

The obligee's right of revocation is examined.

As a result of the fact-finding by this court on the evidence Nos. 1 through 10 (including paper numbers), the fact-finding by the President of the Korea Credit Information Institute, the NH Nong Bank, Boh-soo Bank, Bohyeong Credit Union, and Han Bank's response to financial transaction information, the whole purport of the arguments can be acknowledged in accordance with the evidence Nos. 3.

However, considering the results of the fact-finding conducted by this court against Eul Nos. 1 through Eul No. 19 (including the paper numbers), the fact-finding conducted by this court against the Nam-gu Incheon Nam-gu Office, and the purport of the entire pleadings in the response to financial transaction information of Han Bank, the defendant could be recognized as having known that he had been unaware of having caused harm to the creditor of Eul due to the conclusion of the lease contract on May 16, 2014. The defendant's defense pointing this out has merit.

Therefore, we cannot accept all of the plaintiff's claims on the grounds of merit.