Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, the defendant A shall be sentenced to the above punishment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the head of the F Village in Gangwon-gu, Suwon-gu, and the victim B(70) is a person who resides in the same village.

1. On December 14, 2016, Defendant A’s special injury: (a) around 23:20 on the Victim B’s house located in Gyeyang-gu, Yangwon-gun G; (b) around 19:00 on the same day, the victim B refused to prosecute the Defendant’s agenda while holding a meeting in relation to the use, etc. of Trackter supported by the Water Resources Corporation at the NF Community Center in Gangseo-gu, Yangwon-gu, Yangwon-gun, Yangwon-gun, and thus, Defendant A refused to prosecute the Defendant’s agenda; (c) As such, the part of the facts charged is dismissed as follows; (d)

At the end of the 130 cm, which is a dangerous and sealed product for the victim's chest, the head of the victim is faced with several times in the following LPG gas supply, and the face, hair, etc. was faced with the victim's body.

As a result, Defendant A carried dangerous objects and inflicted injury on the victim B, such as brain-dead sugar, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

2. The injured Defendant A: at the time and place described in paragraph 1, and at the victim H (or 71 years of age) who is the wife B (or the victim H) prevented the Defendant; and the victim H (or 71 years of age) released the Defendant, Defendant A laid down the two arms of the victim H above the floor.

As a result, Defendant A suffered injury to the victim H, such as diversous salt, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Each legal statement of witness B, H and I;

1. The defendant A and his defense counsel asserted that the victim A did not have been faced with the head of the gas tank or the victim B by the impeachment process. The defendant A and the defense counsel asserted that the victim B had not been faced with the victim B by the impeachment process or by the gas tank.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by evidence, it can be sufficiently recognized that Defendant A inflicted an injury on the victim B under the same circumstances as the stated in paragraph (1) of the crime committed by Defendant A.

(1)