logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.07.12 2018고단9477
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and the victim C are in conflict with each other from March 2018, and the defendant B is in conflict with the defendant A.

1. On March 25, 2018, Defendant A’s sole criminal defendant made a false statement to the victim to the effect that “hyma would have borrowed 100,000 won (B) to the president, who was the president, who frequently frequent due to lack of hospital expenses due to brain diseases. He/she has to repay the money, and there is an amount of KRW 10,000,000,000,000 from the I house deposit with which he/she was living together. The due date is May 8, 2018, and if he/she received KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000 won,” the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “hyma would be repaid.”

However, the lack of hospital expenses.

There was no obligation to repay to B, and there was no security deposit to receive the refund from I, and there was no intention or ability to repay, even if the money was borrowed from I for other purposes, such as remitting 700,000 won to I.

Therefore, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 1 million from the victim to the J bank K account in the name of J bank B on the same day, and received a total of KRW 4.2 million from that time to May 14, 2018 from that time, by means of the same manner as the list of crimes (1) in the attached Form No. 1, and received a remittance of KRW 4.2 million in cash.

2. On April 4, 2017, Defendant A made a false statement to the effect that “B still left the money borrowed to B. If the money is additionally lent, whether the deposit is paid or not,” Defendant A sent the victim with a false statement to the effect that “A shall have the contents of text exchanged with Defendant B and sent it to the victim.” Defendant B made a false statement to the effect that “Defendant B shall have a large amount of claim against Defendant A, and the victim shall have the obligation repaid on behalf of the victim.”

However, the fact is that there is a debt to be repaid to B.

(2) there has been a deposit for return.

arrow