1. The Defendants: (a) on May 201, 201, the Ulsan District Court Yangsan District Court’s two offices regarding the real estate stated in the separate sheet to each Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 3, 1984, F completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to G 4,777 square meters (hereinafter “land prior to subdivision”) in Yangsan-si, Yangsan-si. The registration of ownership transfer with respect to the marking of land at least Myeon is omitted.

B. Around June 24, 2013, a field of 2,655 square meters divided into G 4,777 square meters and transferred to H.

(C) The G 2,122 square meters remaining after the division as above shall be the real estate indicated in the attached list (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”).

On May 6, 201, F: (a) on May 6, 201, the Defendants: (b) completed the provisional registration of ownership transfer claim (hereinafter “each provisional registration of this case”; and (c) the provisional registration of this case with respect to the instant real estate was completed with respect to the land and the land owned by F prior to subdivision and the instant real estate (the combination of the land and the said land before subdivision; hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”; (d) on the basis of a provisional registration certificate, the Defendants: (a) determined the price of each of the instant real estate as KRW 1,00,000,000 and paid the said price to F at the F’s address without setting a period, and at the same time expressed an intention to complete the purchase and sale; (b) filed an application for ownership transfer registration of each of the instant real estate under such condition that the Defendants should deliver each of the instant real estate to the Defendants.”

F On December 15, 2014, the Plaintiff, who died on December 15, 2014, was a child of the network F (hereinafter “the deceased”), is permanently engaging in the name of “A” and “M”;

J and K completed the registration of transfer of ownership on June 19, 2015 as the receipt No. 42112 on the grounds that the Plaintiff had succeeded to the instant real estate due to the division of consultation.

E. The Defendants are the siblings of the Deceased.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 2-1, Eul evidence 9-2.