logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2013.10.18 2012고합160
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Cone Star in driving a motor vehicle.

On June 3, 2012, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver's license on June 17:15, 2012, and led to turn to the left at the speed of about 20 km from the place of sale of Hyundai Motor Vehicles, the front road of Madrop, which is Madrop, in Chuncheon-si, to the speed of about 10 km.

At the same time, motor vehicles were parked on both sides of the road, so there was a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by accurately operating the steering gear, by living well the right and the right of the motor vehicle driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in driving while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver's license and was parked on the right side of the running direction of the Defendant, and the left side of the EP motor vehicle owned by the Victim D was taken into the right side of the Defendant's driving.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant damaged a victim’s car to have an amount equivalent to KRW 520,872 as repair cost due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant left away without taking necessary measures to remove the danger and obstacle to traffic by immediately stopping the car and confirming the damage situation.

2. On June 3, 2012, from around 17:48 to 18:11 on the same day, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the measurement): (a) the Defendant refused a police officer’s request for the measurement of alcohol without justifiable grounds and refused to comply with a police officer’s demand for the measurement of alcohol, on the grounds that there exist reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driven under the influence of alcohol, such as a large distance of walking, from the border area G, etc. belonging to the said district police station, the face of the Defendant from the border area G, etc. belonging to the said district, etc.; and (b) the horses are

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of D.

arrow