1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 1, 1986, the pertinent Plaintiff was newly appointed as a full-time lecturer at C University, a private school established and operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant university”), and was promoted to an assistant professor on April 1, 1995, and the period of appointment expires on February 28, 2007 (from March 1, 2003 to February 28, 2007), and was retired from reappointment on June 29, 2007, and was reinstated on March 1, 201 and served in the said university until February 28, 2014. The Defendant is the person who has the authority to appoint faculty members of the instant university, including the Plaintiff.

B. On October 25, 2006, the university of this case announced the list of subjects for reappointment including the plaintiff on October 25, 2006, documents to be submitted, and procedures for reappointment. The plaintiff submitted the records of reappointment to the above university on November 10, 2006. On April 11, 2007, the above university announced the list of subjects for reappointment including the plaintiff, documents to be submitted, and procedures for reappointment. The plaintiff again submitted the records of reappointment to the above university. 2) The standards for the appointment of faculty members of the university of this case are more than 500 points average of the records evaluation of the three years subject to the evaluation of the plaintiff's achievements. The above university evaluated the average points of the evaluation of the plaintiff's achievements as below 500 points, and held a teachers' personnel committee on May 25, 2007 to the plaintiff and the plaintiff with an opportunity to vindicate the plaintiff.

6. 11. The university of this case submitted explanatory materials.

3) On June 13, 2007, the university of this case held a teachers' personnel committee on the 8th of the same month and held a teachers' personnel committee on the 22th of the same month in order to provide the plaintiff with an opportunity to vindicate, and decided to resign the plaintiff by holding a board of directors on the same day to the effect that the plaintiff constitutes a person subject to the exclusion from reappointment pursuant to Article 9(1) of the Teachers' Personnel Management Regulations. The defendant's chief director notified the plaintiff of the exclusion from reappointment on the 29th of the same month (hereinafter "disposition for the exclusion from reappointment").

C. The Plaintiff’s reinstatement and resignation 1) The Plaintiff is a teacher’s appeals review committee.