The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. In addition to the evidence newly submitted to this court in the first instance court citing the judgment of the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if all of the allegations of the parties are examined.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Under the third letter of the judgment of the court of first instance, the first and second deeds are as follows: “E. Defendant B was registered as the representative director of the corporation C from March 2001 to July 2020; and “A No. 47” was added to the grounds for recognition of the third and fourth deeds.

Under the third page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term “instant shares” shall be read as “stocks listed in the attached Table (hereinafter “instant shares”)”.

The third part of the judgment of the court of first instance states that “Defendant B shall be deemed to have properly transferred or ultimately reverted the ownership of the shares of this case to Defendant B in return for the contribution to improving the management performance of the company and the labor management performance of the company, at the request of the Plaintiff on March 21, 2001, by taking office as the representative director of the company C at the request of the Plaintiff on November 1, 201, or by changing the name of H and I out of 50 million shares, which were registered in the name of Defendant B on November 1, 2010, into the name of 20 million shares, and 30 million shares of this case shall continue to be owned by Defendant B. Thus, Defendant B shall be deemed to have continuously transferred or finally reverted to Defendant B in return for the contribution to the improvement of the management performance of the company and the labor management performance of the company for a long period of time.” Thus, Defendant B asserts that Defendant B is the actual shareholder of the shares of this case.”

It is reasonable to view that the shares of this case exist in Section 8 of the fourth part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and as alleged by Defendant B, Defendant B transferred the shares of this case from the Plaintiff.

or the Plaintiff’s ownership of the shares of this case to Defendant B is confirmed and final.