The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Since the defendant, without recognizing the accident of this case, proceeded with the vehicle without recognizing it, the defendant had no intention to commit an escape.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (two years of suspended execution in August, and forty hours of order to attend school) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, the defendant: (1) under the influence of alcohol at around 02:0 on January 1, 2014, the victim F, who operated a taxi at one lane near the above intersection, was driven by the second line in the direction of the water station in the direction of the water station in the direction of the water station, while under the influence of alcohol at least 0.119%, and (2) the above intersection was a place where the left left turn at the direction of the police station in the direction of the network station in the direction of the network station. (3) The victim F, who was driven a taxi at one lane near the above intersection at the time, was stopped at the front direction of the apartment road, but the defendant was unable to stop at the front direction of the vehicle, and (5) The victim was able to stop the vehicle at the front direction of the apartment road at the entrance of the police station, and then the victim was able to stop immediately after the collision.