A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

Criminal facts

On September 24, 2013, at the front of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, the Defendant sent a phone number to D with the Defendant on the same day on the street, but he received the phone number from D in lieu of the victim E, who was drinking together with D, at the neighboring main point, and caused the victim to flick the face of the victim one time by drinking, and continued to flick the victim's head by drinking.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as internal surgery that requires approximately four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. The prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of the accused (including E statements);

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused (including the E Statement);

1. Each police statement of E;

1. Reporting on occurrence of an injury incident;

1. Related photographs and a written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for communication confirmation data;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion regarding the criminal facts, Article 257(1) of the relevant criminal law, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion that the Defendant and the Defendant, at the time of the above crime, have no fact of asking the victim as stated in the criminal facts, and the victim, rather, asserts that the Defendant and the defense counsel suffered from the pertinent injury, i.e., the Defendant and the defense counsel who had been given a warning, by putting the victim out of the above main point.

The following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence are consistent with the investigation agency to the court, and ① the victim stated that the victim was suffering from eye and crypology on several occasions by drinking the Defendant (the witness E’s statement and investigation record Nos. 5, 21, 22, 91, 19-21). At the time, the Defendant and the victim were first viewed as the victim.