1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. Basic facts

A. At around 11:00 on August 26, 2012, F: (a) driven by a non-registered fluor (97C; hereinafter “Defendant’s side 2”); (b) drive a wing 2-lane 513 local highway (3.1m wide breadth) located in Jincheon-gun G, Jincheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-do; and (c) driving a wing wing Do road (3.1m wide breadth) in the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the year; (d) driven the center line in the direction of the right angle to the left (3.0m wide breadth); and (d) died in the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the year of death (hereinafter “Plaintiff 1,50c, 200”).

B. The defendant Oral Ba did not subscribe to liability insurance under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act.

C. Pursuant to Articles 30 and 45(1)1 of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (Amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013); and Articles 19 and 20 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (Amended by Presidential Decree No. 24443, Mar. 23, 2013); the Plaintiff is an insurance company entrusted with the business of guaranteeing automobile accident compensation under Article 30 of the said Act by the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs; and upon receiving a claim for damages from a mother, the only heir of the deceasedI, the Plaintiff paid KRW 10,000,000, which is the maximum amount of compensation for death under the standards for paying liability insurance proceeds, to L on November 15, 2012.

Before the instant accident, the Network I received the amount of KRW 2,231,100 from KRW 2,714,140 per month to KRW 2,714,140 per month, while serving as the production worker of M prior to the instant accident.

Defendant B is the wife of the network F, and the rest of the Defendants are the children of the network F.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 8 (including each number for additional evidence), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination:

A. According to the above fact of recognition of damages liability, the deceased F’s heir is the deceased F’s heir.