logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.08.08 2016고단2529
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 10, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny and a fine of 300,000 won in Seoul Western District Court on August 5, 2014, and completed the execution of the sentence in Seoul Southern District Court on August 5, 2014.

1. On February 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a DB car under the influence of alcohol for about 0.062% of alcohol while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of about 5km from the road near the mouth in which it is difficult to find out the address below the Suwon-si Station at around 02:58 on February 21, 2016 to the road in which it is difficult to identify the address; and (b) the Defendant driven a DB car under the influence of alcohol for about 0.062% in blood.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a DNA driver car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Egressing Vehicle) and the Road Traffic Act (Egress after accidents).

A. On February 21, 2016, the Defendant driven a small-type car with a alcohol content of 0.062% in alcohol during blood at around 02:54, while driving a small-type car in the influence of alcohol, and driving a two-lane road in front of the head of Suwon-si, Suwon-si along the two-lanes in the direction of the draft of the river in the direction of the horizontal length, and driving a two-lane along the speed of about 20km in the direction of the draft of the river in the direction of the horizontal distance, and changed the lane into a one-lane.

At the time, there is a night and a place where a white line is installed. In such a case, there was a duty of care to safely change the car line by checking whether there is a vehicle prior to the lane intended to change the right and the right of the vehicle to a person engaged in driving.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not properly examine the right and the right and the right and the right and the part of the victim F(63) driving prior to the Defendant’s moving direction was added to the front left side of the taxi of the Defendant F(63).

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to the foregoing occupational negligence.

arrow