beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around May 9, 2012, the Defendant: (a) entered into a contract with a person specialized in interior works, such as windows, miscellaneous and internal organs; (b) a person who operates "D"; and (c) a person who newly constructs "D" and "C" G loan; and (c) the Defendant and C entered into a contract with the Defendant to pay the foregoing 9 household units of G loan as the substitute for the construction cost, around 6 the above G building (F 101 Dong, 102 Dong, 103 Dong, 105 Dong, 109 Dong, 110 Dong, 110 Dong, 110 Dong).
On the other hand, in the building site of the above loan, the owner of the land obtained a loan for the purpose of securing the construction cost and has already established the right to collateral security, and the loan should be transferred equally to each household at the time of installment registration after the completion of loan.
The Defendant sold the foregoing nine households received as a substitute to cover the construction cost in the Do in which the said interior works are carried out, or repaid to the subcontractor as a substitute, and C prepared a purchase and sale contract under the name of the buyer H, I and subcontractors, J, K and “D” with the Defendant.
Since the Defendant and C calculated the Defendant’s share of the loans of the said nine generations in the settlement of construction cost around December 24, 2013, the Defendant and C calculated the Defendant’s share of the loans of the said nine generations, they were in a relationship with the said nine generations and three others, and thus, the Defendant is responsible for the Defendant’s share of the loans of each household. However, the Defendant did not resolve the share of the loans of each household. The Defendant filed a claim for damages against the Plaintiff, the seller under the loan transaction agreement, and C was responsible for the Defendant’s share of the loans of the said nine households at the time of the settlement of the accounts on December 24, 2013, and C applied for the Defendant as a witness of the said lawsuit.