1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a cooperative established to implement a housing redevelopment improvement project (hereinafter “instant improvement project”) by using the area of 44,056 square meters in Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City as a rearrangement zone. The Defendant obtained authorization to implement the project on January 12, 2017 from the head of the Dong-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City.

B. The Plaintiff is the owner of the land and buildings indicated in the attached Table 1 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant real estate”) included in the rearrangement zone of the instant rearrangement project, and applied for the application for parcelling-out to the Defendant within the period of application for parcelling-out set by

C. On December 29, 2017, the Defendant notified the public inspection plan for the approval plan for the management and disposal plan, and determined the Plaintiff’s right to the instant real estate as KRW 144,903,50 according to the amount of the Plaintiff’s sale price, and determined KRW 134,39,500, the remainder of KRW 139,296,000, which is the price calculated by deducting the said sale price from the sale price of multi-family housing of KRW 84 square meters.

On January 25, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the Defendant to increase the amount of the right on the ground that the said right is unreasonable. On February 19, 2018, the Defendant issued a notice of the result of the management and disposal plan D Committee to the effect that the previous appraisal and assessment of the instant real estate is lawful (hereinafter “instant notice”).

E. On March 26, 2018, the Defendant obtained authorization from the head of the Dong/Dong of Gwangju Metropolitan City for a management and disposal plan for the instant improvement project (hereinafter “instant management and disposal plan”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, 5, 7, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. On February 19, 2018, the part that the Defendant’s assertion against the Plaintiff’s motion to increase the amount of compensation was dismissed should be revoked as it is unlawful due to the defect in the content. The Defendant shall conduct a re-appraisal of the real estate at low-evaluation and request the approval of the modification of the instant management and disposal plan, and the re-appraisald.