beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On January 22, 1980, the Plaintiff acquired Class I ordinary driver's license and Class I driver's license on February 23, 1986, respectively, and was driving B ambulances (hereinafter "the instant ambulances") by affiliated with the GIC in the GIC (Seoul).
B. On February 22, 2014, at around 15:00, the Plaintiff issued a traffic accident with one middle person and 1 upper person, and the given 35 points (15 points and 5 points and 15 points and 5 points among signal violations).
C. After that, around 07:00 on July 23, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) while driving the instant ambulances at a point of 316.8km located in the central expressway located in Mang-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si, the Plaintiff was killed by C, who was on board the said ambulances, with the central separation unit and the right retaining wall in order; (b) the injury requiring four weeks of medical treatment; and (c) E, with the injury requiring two weeks of medical treatment (hereinafter “instant accident”).
In the instant accident, the Plaintiff was given a total of 120 points (one point of 10 points, one point of 90 points, one point of 15 points and five points of 15 points of death of breach of duty of safe driving), and the total sum of 35 points and 15 points of the existing points became 155 points for one year. Accordingly, on November 20, 2014, the Defendant issued the instant disposition revoking the Plaintiff’s driver’s license as of December 21, 2014 pursuant to Article 93(2) of the Road Traffic Act, Article 91(1) [Attachment Table 28] of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act.
[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3, Eul evidence 1, 2, 3, and 7 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant accident occurred while driving an emergency patient in an imminent situation where the patient is sent back, and it is an accident that occurred under force majeure, and the Plaintiff obtained a driver’s license in 1980 and used his family as a livelihood.