A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 2019, the Defendant: (a) during the search of “large-amount Ambrate” at a website B, the Defendant heard the word “Ambrates money from an unqualified person C to the gambling site account; (b) transferred money to the gambling site account; (c) requested the police to pay the money to the bank call center in the account that reported a loan fraud; and (d) requested the police to pay the money; and (e) received money from the gambling site operator from the gambling site operator, he/she would pay the money at least KRW 200,000 per case as allowances; and (e) from May 28, 2019 to November 40 of the same day, from around 11:10 on May 28, 2019, the Defendant remitted the money to the E account in the name of D limited liability company (F); (f) the E account in the name of G; (H); (J) the E account in the name of the limited liability company; (J) the E account in the name of the limited liability company;

1. On May 29, 2019, the Defendant suffered damage by remitting KRW 2,50,000,00 to the 2.5 million loan to the head of the Suwon-nam Police Station Intelligence Team at Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which was 52, according to the above solicitation, even though there was no fact that a telecommunications-based financial fraud was damaged.

“The” shall prepare a petition of the content and submit a statement to the head of the police station affiliated with the above police station to the effect as above, and shall receive it as a case of internal investigation at the police station, and was issued by the head of the Si/Gun/Gu to the above purport.

By reporting as if the Defendant was damaged by telecommunications-based financial fraud, the Defendant had the police officer in charge mistake that the situation would have to respond urgently, and had the reported case investigated.

Accordingly, the defendant in collusion with the person who was not injured in his name and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation of police officers by fraudulent means.

2. On May 30, 2019, the Defendant violated the Special Act on Prevention of Loss and Refund of Loss Caused by Telecommunications-based Financial Fraud P at Suwon-si.