beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.
An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 2, 2012, the Defendant was employed by the Defendant for the 1110 Taedong-dong 110 Sungdong-dong, Seodong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, and around that time, the Defendant was on dispatch from the victim joint and several liability corporation located in the Chinese joint and several investment cities, which is a local subsidiary located in Masan-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, and was on dispatch to D in charge of the company C affairs.
However, in order to withdraw funds from the Chinese corporate account, the document work is complicated, the Chinese construction bank account in the name of E of the local subsidiary that can immediately be deposited and deposited in the account in the name of E of the local subsidiary, and after depositing a certain amount in the account in the name of E of the local subsidiary, the expenses for operating expenses, cooperation, factory rent, food rental, and transit bus have been disbursed under the settlement of the defendant after depositing the amount in the account in the name of E of the local subsidiary.
around March 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) had a mind to use money deposited in the account in the name of Mcaro in gambling; and (b) instructed the said E to “100,000 (17,854,000 won in cash) to transfer the bill to the Chinese Construction Bank’s account in the name of the Defendant; (c) received the remittance of the said bill from E and arbitrarily used it for gambling money at that place; (d) from that time until November 12, 2014, the Defendant embezzled it for business purposes by using the said method in total 16 times as indicated in the crime list as follows (524,474,819 won in exchange rate base on November 12, 2014).
Each entry of No. 11, No. 13, “ September 9, 2014,” and “ September 19, 2014,” written indictment No. 11, No. 13, in the annual bill of indictment, are deemed to be written in each clerical error of “ June 9, 2014” and “ June 19, 2014,” respectively, and are deemed to be written in each clerical error of “10,000.”