The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (one year of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable as the gist of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, and against his mistake, etc.

However, the defendant has been punished several times due to the same crime, and the defendant committed the same kind of crime again even though he was sentenced to a fine by the court after he committed a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act during the period of suspension of execution. The crime of violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act requires strict punishment due to severe social harm, such as promoting excessive speculative spirit to the general public, etc. In addition, in full view of the defendant's age, character, character, character, intelligence and environment, motive, background, means, method, method and consequence of the crime, criminal record relation, circumstance before and after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is too excessive and unfair. Thus, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal of this case is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.