2012 Highest 4339 A. Occupational failure, etc.

(b) Injury by occupational negligence;

(c) Violation of the Installation, Maintenance and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting Systems Act;

1.(a)(c) A;

2.(a)(c) B

3.(a)(c) C

4.(a)(b) D

5. (a) E;

6.(c)F

Eassort (prosecutions) and prosecutorials (Trial)

Law Firm G (for defendant A, B, C, D, and E)

Attorney H, I, and J

November 28, 2012

1. Defendant A, B, and C shall be punished by imprisonment for four years, by imprisonment for two years, by imprisonment for two years, by imprisonment for two years, by imprisonment for two years and six months, and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

2.Provided, That the execution of each of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of four years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, for defendant D, E, and for two years for defendant F.

Criminal facts

Defendant B and Defendant C invested KRW 225,00,000 from July 2, 2009 to jointly run the “M”, which is an entertainment drinking house located in the third floor of the K Lbuilding located in Busan-gu, Busan-gu. Defendant F worked as the president of the said singing shop from July 2, 2009 to June 201. Defendant A followed Defendant F from around August 26, 2010 to enter the place of business of the said singing shop. Defendant A invested KRW 30,00,000, and invested KRW 30,000,000, and 6% of the shares. Defendant D is an employee of the said singing shop from around October 6, 201 to manage the business of the said singing shop, and Defendant C is an employee of the said singing shop from around 200,000, and Defendant C is an employee of the said singing shop from around 20,201, and Defendant C is an employee of the said singing shop.

On June 22, 2009, Defendant B and C entered into a lease agreement with the owner of the above L building at KRW 100,00,000, monthly rent of KRW 8,000,000 in order to start an entertainment tavern business on the third floor of the above L building. Defendant F entered into a lease agreement with the owner of the above L building under the name of Defendant F, and the alteration of use, business registration, etc. of the entertainment tavern under the name of Defendant F, and the area of 3,987,23 square meters above the third floor of 51.41 square meters above the ground among the total floor area of 3,987, the area of 51.41 square meters above the third floor of 3,00 square meters above, 24,00 emergency exits, 3, main rooms, auxiliary rooms, and fire-fighting systems, etc. The installation and management of fire-fighting systems from around July 22, 2009, by taking into account the function and capacity of the owner, manager or manager of fire-fighting-fighting facilities, etc.

Around June 22, 2009, when obtaining permission to change the purpose of use of the above singing room as an entertainment tavern business, three emergency exits have been installed. However, around October 2009, the said singing room installed in the passage via an emergency exit, which was installed on the opposite 25th page of the entrance door of the said singing store, and remodeled only once by installing shocks, tables, singing-sing devices, monitors, etc., and removed a contact-type bridge directly adjacent to the emergency door so that it cannot be opened outside or outside the cable, and the emergency exit, such as fire-fighting systems, was removed. Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to close and block the emergency exit, such as fire-fighting systems.

2. Violation of the Installation, Maintenance, and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting Systems Act by Defendant B, C, or A;

On June 201, the Defendants conspired to employ a man-made service provider at the instant singing shop and install a new door door at the entrance of an emergency exit right next to the entrance, thereby creating a space between the corridor and the emergency exit and making it difficult for the Defendants to display an emergency exit sign, etc., and using the emergency exit, such as fire-fighting systems, such as the fire-fighting systems, by altering it into a drinking warehouse where alcoholic beverages, beer, etc. are loaded inside the entrance.

3. Defendants B, C, D, and E’s occupational negligence, death, and bodily injury caused by occupational negligence are publicly-used establishments under the Special Act on the Safety Management of Publicly Used Establishments. It is difficult to promptly evacuate in the event that most customers are under the influence of alcohol due to fire, etc., which lacks the ability to determine the situation and cope with the situation, and in the event that poisonous gas is generated, it is difficult to promptly evacuate.

Defendant B, C, and A are in a position to operate a publicly-used establishment as a joint business owner of the above singing points. As such, Defendant B, C, and A are in a position to inspect electric facilities, etc. at the above singing points in advance to prevent the occurrence of fire caused by electricity. ② Under the provisions of the Special Act on the Safety Control of Publicly Used Establishments, Defendant B, and A shall install and maintain the escape equipment, such as emergency lighting, portable emergency lighting, portable emergency lighting, and escape equipment, and manage them to maintain their functions. ③ Fire prevention equipment, fire prevention equipment, emergency exit, and emergency exit are properly installed and maintained to ensure that they can promptly install emergency bell equipment, emergency broadcasting equipment, independent alarm device, and maintain their functions. ⑤ When an emergency situation, such as a fire, etc., occurred, ⑤ When the emergency situation, such as a fire, etc., occurred, the method to cope with the fire should be provided to employees in advance, so that they can promptly and appropriately respond to the emergency situation, such as fire-fighting equipment and employees should be informed of the emergency situation in advance.

Defendant D, who is an assistant store of the above singing shop, and Defendant E, an employee, have a duty of care to prevent the expansion of human life damage by sounding a fire alarm in manually, informing customers of the fact that a fire has occurred rapidly, and immediately guiding customers by immediately guiding them by emergency exit and entrance, etc., in order to prevent the spread of fire caused by fire-fighting activities, etc., and in particular, to prevent the spread of human life and property damage.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인 B, 피고인 C, 피고인 A은 ① 본건 화재가 발생하기 약 6개월 전인 2011. 11. 7. 같은 건물 2층에 있는 '0주점'에서 전기적 원인으로 추정되는 화재가 발생하여 70,000,000원 상당의 재산피해가 있었다는 사실을 잘 알고 있었고, 특히 본건 화재 발생 전에 위 노래주점에서 누전 · 과부하 · 단락 겸용 차단기가 수회에 걸쳐 작동되어 전기가 들어오지 않은 사실이 있으므로, 이러한 경우에는 위 차단기의 작동원인을 조사하고 위 노래주점 내에 연결되어 있는 전선의 절연체가 손상되었는지를 점검하여 전기설비 상의 문제가 있는지 여부를 확인하여야 할 의무가 있음에도 불구하고 이를 게을리 한 채 위 노래주점 내에 연결되어 있는 전선의 절연체가 손상되었는지 여부를 점검하지 않아 전기설비 상의 위험성을 크게 하였고1), ② 화재가 발생할 경우 손님들을 신속하게 피난하도록 유도하는 피난설비인 휴대용비상조명등을 각 방마다 설치하고 정상적으로 작동하도록 유지, 관리하여야 함에도 불구하고, 26개 방 중 10개 방에만 휴대용비상조명등이 설치되어 있고, 그 중 5개는 건전지가 없어 전원이 들어오지 않는 상태로 방치하였으며, ③ 25번 방 옆 비상구에 쇼파, 테이블, 노래방기기, 모니터 등을 설치하여 방으로 개조하고, 외부로 통하는 비상구 문을 케이블 끈으로 묶어 고정시켜 내·외부에서 개방하지 못하게 폐쇄하며, 비상구 문 바로 옆에 있던 접이식 비상사다리를 해체하여 철거하고, 출입문 옆에 있는 비상구 복도 입구에 여닫이 문을 새로 설치하는 방법으로 복도와 비상구 문 사이의 공간을 방으로 만들어 비상구 표시등이 보이지 않게 하고, 그 공간에 주류박스, 생맥주통 등 각종 물품 등을 적재 보관하는 술 창고로 개조하여 비상구를 폐쇄함으로써 피해자들로 하여금 비상구로 대피할 수 없도록 하고, ④ 각 방에는 방음시설이 설치되어 있어 방 외부의 상황을 인지하기 어려우므로 화재 발생시에는 경보설비인 화재감지기가 연기·열 등을 자동으로 감지하여 정상적으로 비상경보가 울릴 수 있도록 유지, 관리하여야 하고, 각 방 및 복도에 설치되어 있는 수동 화재경보기도 수시로 점검하여 정상적으로 작동되도록 하여야 함에도 불구하고, 화재가 발생하였을 때 화재감지기가 이를 자동으로 감지하지 못하여 비상경보가 제대로 울리지 않도록 관리를 게을리 하고, 수동 화재경보기도 제대로 작동하도록 점검하지 않았을 뿐 아니라, 평소에 술에 취한 손님들이 비상벨을 오작동시켜 각 방에 비상벨이 울리게 되면 영업에 방해를 받는다는 이유로 카운터 오른쪽에 설치되어있는 '영상음향차단장치(일명 비상벨 수신기)'의 '복구정지(리셋기능)' 버튼의 빈틈에 수시로 이쑤시개를 꽂아두어 비상벨 경보가 작동하지 않도록 하고, ⑤ 종업원들에게 소화, 통보, 피난 등의 훈련과 방안에 있는 손님들에게 신속하게 비상구를 안내하는 등 대피요령, 휴대용조명등 사용방법, 비상벨 위치 및 사용방법 등 소방안전관리에 필요한 교육을 실시하여 위급상황에 신속하고 적절하게 대처할 수 있도록 준비하여야 하여야 함에도 불구하고, 피고인 D, 피고인 E을 비롯한 종업원들에게 위 교육을 전혀 시키지 않은 업무상 과실이 있고, 피고인 D은 위 노래주점 남자 화장실에 있다가 나왔을 때 화재가 발생하였다는 것을 알게 되었는데, 당시는 화재로 인한 화염이 번지기 전으로 연기만 퍼져 있는 화재 발생 초기 상태였으므로 부점장으로서 다른 종업원들과 함께 또는 다른 종업원들에게 지시하여 손님들에게 화재사실을 즉시 알리고 대피조치를 취하거나 비상벨 작동 등의 조치를 취하여야 함에도 불구하고 그 즉시 혼자 주점 출입구를 빠져나와 계단을 통해 1층으로 도주하여 구호조치를 회피한 업무상 과실이 있고, 피고인 E은 최초 발화한 24번방 앞에 있는 주방과 25번방을 오가며 써빙을 하다가, 종업원 P이 24번방에서 발생한 화재를 진압하기 위해 방문을 열고 소화기로 진화를 시도하고 있었고, 유독가스가 복도전체로 확산되고 있는 상황을 목격하여 화재 발생 사실을 알고 있었음에도 계속하여 25번방의 손님들에게 써빙을 하였고, 손님들이 "이 상한 냄새가 나지 않냐"는 물음에도 "괜찮습니다"라고 답하여 손님들을 안심시키고 있다가, 유독가스가 복도로 퍼지고 화재가 더욱 확산되자 비로소 단지 위 25번방의 문을 열고 입구 쪽 손님 1~2명만 들을 수 있는 작은 소리로 "나가셔야 합니다. 나오세요"라는 말을 하여 화재발생사실을 제대로 알리지 않았고, 복도에는 유독가스가 가득 차있어 시야확보가 되지 않는 상태였기 때문에 손님들이 제대로 대피하도록 출입구 방향을 알려주어야 함에도 불구하고, 그 즉시 자신만 출입구 방향으로 뛰어 대피하여 25번방의 손님 12명에게 출입구 방향을 알려주지 않고 그대로 방치한 업무상 과실이 있다.

Ultimately, the above occupational negligence of Defendant B, C, A, D, and E are concurrent, and around 20:50 on May 5, 2012, at around 20:20:50, the fire caused by the interruption of smoke from the electric wires installed on the third floor of the Lbuilding located in the Busan-gu Busan-gu Office "M main store located on the third floor of the LA building located in the Busan-gu K" to the shock, wall, and 21 adjacent thereto, causing the victim Q Q (30 years of age) to die by carrying a large quantity of poisonous gas while carrying the inside of the sculp, wall, and causing a large quantity of poisonous gas death, and at the same time, the victim RR (32 years of age) to death by the quality of poisonous gas, as shown in the attached Table, as well as the day table (1) of the victim's day of treatment.

In addition to the victim's list (2), 24 victims suffered injury, such as the number of days of treatment, such as the addition of the victim's list (2).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. Legal statement of witness S;

1. Each legal statement of the witness F, T, P, and U;

1. Statement of witness V in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of statement about W and X;

1. Each police statement of the Y, Z, AAB, AC, AD, AE, AE, AF, AH, AI, AJ, AK, AL, AM, AO, AP, AP, Q, AS, ATS, AU, AV, AV, AX, AX, AY, AZ, AZ, AZ, BA, BB, B, B, B, B, B, BG, B, B, B, U, B, B, B, B, B, or B;

1. Report on the occurrence of each case of change, suggestion for direction, request for autopsy, report on the results of autopsy, written request for autopsy, written request for autopsy, and written request for autopsy and appraisal of each body;

1. Current status of the fire-fighting facilities of M points, current status of the fire-fighting systems of M points, current status of inspection of the fire-fighting systems of K sing points, joint identification with fire stations of K sing points, current status of emergency exits within M points, and entrustment of appraisal by the

1. On-site photographs, on-site photographs (2j), photographs of an emergency exit sponsive bridge photographs, photographs of leaving the ridges, documents related to the approval of Lbuilding (MM stores, etc.), documents related to L building, and briefings for requests

1. Application of the CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes to each mobile station;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Defendant B and C: Articles 268 and 30 of each Criminal Act, Articles 48 and 9(3) of the Act on the Restoration and Safety Management of Fire-Fighting Systems, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (a)

(b) Defendant A: Articles 268 and 30 of each Criminal Act, Articles 48 and 9(3) of the Act on the Place of Installation and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting Systems, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (a point of blocking the closure of fire-fighting systems);

C. Defendant D and E: Articles 268 and 30 of the Criminal Code

D. Defendant F: Articles 48 and 9(3) of the Installation, Maintenance, and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting Systems Act and Article 30 of the Criminal Act.

1. Commercial competition;

Defendant A, B, C, D, and E: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code

1. Selection of punishment;

Defendant A, B, C, and F: Defendant D and E of each imprisonment without prison labor: Selection of each imprisonment without prison labor

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

Defendant A, B, and C: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Suspension of execution;

Defendant D, E, and F: The reasons for sentencing of the Defendants under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are as follows: (a) if the Defendants did not interfere with the instant crime by altering the space adjacent to the instant victim before the occurrence of the instant fire, they would have reached a door to use the passage connected to outdoor stairs as a liquor warehouse; and (b) if they did not have operated properly, if the portable emergency lighting, etc. was installed, they would have operated only immediately and immediately; (c) if the employees would have immediately reduced the seriousness of the instant situation and immediately evacuated the victims, they would have been able to avoid or significantly reduce damage caused by the victims’ lives or bodies, by failing to comply with the instant crime; and (d) if they did not have been able to take into account the circumstances of the instant accident, the Defendants would not have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to take account of the fact that they did not have the duty of due care at the time of the instant accident; and (d) if they did not have been able to have been able to take advantage of the need to prevent the Defendants from fire.

Judges Kim Gin-ok

1) In relation to the replacement of the distribution circuit voluntarily, it is deemed that the operator violated his duty of care, but the risk of the distribution circuit on the electrical equipment is high.

In addition, it is difficult to readily conclude that the fire of this case was the direct cause of the fire of this case, and this part of the facts charged is the defendant and defense counsel.

The argument is accepted and excluded from the content of breach of duty of care in the facts charged.