1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver 139.42 square meters of the second floor office among the buildings listed in the attached list;

B. May 13, 2016

1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in attached Form; and

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. On May 13, 2016, the day following the termination date of the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff partially dismissed the order No. 1-A.

Unless there are special circumstances, it is reasonable to view the monthly rent of KRW 800,000,000 as the monthly rent of KRW 1,200,000, which is the unjust enrichment equivalent to the monthly rent of KRW 1,000,000, in the case of the Plaintiff’s assertion itself. However, even if the Plaintiff’s assertion itself is based on the Plaintiff’s assertion, the monthly rent of the above real estate is 80,000.

Therefore, the part of the plaintiff's claim seeking the return of unjust enrichment exceeding KRW 800,000 is without merit.