logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.10.07 2016고정1922
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a passenger car in CMW 750Li.

1. On February 13, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) is driving the said vehicle at around 19:52, and is driving along one lane between 33-lane and 3-lane in front of the south-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.

They turn to the right of the freeboard distance.

At all times, as the U.S. exclusive lane is marked on the surface by the yellow yellow lines prohibited from entering the intersection in addition to the U.S., there was a duty of care to make no left-hand turn at one lane for a person engaging in driving motor vehicles.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to turn to the left at a two-lane from the negligence of the victim D (the age of 23) who is driving at the left in accordance with the new subparagraph, and caused the fences and front fences, etc. after the left side of the 4S vehicle and the front fences, etc. in front of the right side of the vehicle of the defendant.

The Defendant, by occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim D, such as salt, tensions, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim F, who was on board the above 4S vehicle, due to the following: (a) the victim F, who was on board the above 4S vehicle, for about two weeks of medical treatment; and (b) the victim F, who was on board the Megora 4S vehicle, suffered injury

2. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act damaged the damaged vehicle’s repair cost amounting to KRW 12,89,100 after the left-hand side of the 4S vehicle, which the victim D (the age of 23) drives due to the negligence on duty, such as paragraph (1), at the same time and place as that of paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of statement by the police about D (Simplified traffic);

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written diagnosis (D), written diagnosis (F), and written estimate;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Handling of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act (the point of causing occupational injury).

arrow